FOTW beschäftigt sich mit der Wissenschaft der Vexillologie (Flaggenkunde).
Alle auf dieser Website dargebotenen Abbildungen dienen ausschließlich der Informationsvermittlung im Sinne der Flaggenkunde.
Wir distanziert uns ausdrücklich von allen hierauf dargestellten Symbolen verfassungsfeindlicher Organisationen.
Last modified: 2023-06-03 by zachary harden
Keywords: icrc | red cross | cross | red crescent | crescent |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
by António Martins, 5 March 1999
variant used in Afghanistan; by Zachary Harden, 11 April 2022
The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies does indeed use a similar flag from time to time, as I have seen it around here, mainly on trucks carrying humanitarian help. However, there is never the red border around it. More often a full logo of the organization is used on a white bed sheet - the red crescent and cross in the middle of two black concentric circles, between which is written the name of the organization.
On the headquarters of the organization here in Zagreb the two more usual flags
(Red Cross flag and Red Crescent flag) are hoisted permanently.
Željko Heimer, 8 January 1999
The ICRC website explains:
The International Movement of the Red Cross is composed by the International
Committee of the Red Cross, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red
Crescent Societies and the National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
Ole Andersen, 1 April 2003
The ICRC is exclusively Swiss (thereby giving the whole Red Cross Movement its
neutrality), while the IFRC is made up of societies from 188 nations and
territories. The ICRC is concerned with upholding the Geneva Convention in times
of war, and to render aid in war zones, while the IFRC has a broader scope,
including natural disasters relief, aiding refugees, and blood collection.
Miles Li, 1 April 2003
1864 - The first-ever Geneva Convention was adopted: the red cross on a white ground was officially recognized as the distinctive sign of the medical services of armed forces.So the Red Sun & Lion were evidently official; but for further clarification regarding Magen David Adom, I quote this from the document "The Red Cross and Red Crescent Emblems," dated 1 September 1989:1876 - During the Russo-Turkish war, fought in the Balkans, the Ottoman Empire decided to use a red crescent on a white ground in place of the red cross. Egypt also opted for the red crescent and Persia subsequently chose a red lion and sun on a white ground. These States made reservations to the Conventions, and their exceptional signs were then written into the 1929 Conventions.
1949 - Article 38 of the First Geneva Convention of 1949 confirmed the emblems of the red cross, the red crescent and the red lion and sun on a white ground as the protective signs for army medical services. It thus excluded the use of any exceptional sign other than the red crescent and the red lion and sun.
1980 - The Islamic Republic of Iran decided to give up the red lion and sun and use the red crescent in its place.
1982 - The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies adopted as its emblem the red cross and red crescent on a white ground.
The emblem of the red shield of David is covered in a reservation whose validity has been challenged by a number of authors. Without embarking on a lengthy analysis of a controversial technical legal point, we hold the view that opponents of the State of Israel are bound to respect Israeli medical personnel and equipment on the field of battle.Incidentally, there was a reference to a petition from India in 1977, requesting the acceptance of still another symbol (which was not identified). This request was also denied.In any event, the protective emblem is not constitutive of protection under the Convention; it is merely the visible sign thereof. Members of the medical service shall command respect by virtue of their relief mission, and not because they are indicated by any given distinctive sign.
On the other hand, the International Committee of the Red Cross has been unable formally to recognize the Israeli Red Shield of David Society (Magen David Adom), with which it has maintained excellent working relations for over forty years, owing to the fact that the Society does not fulfil one of the conditions for recognition of new National Societies laid down by the Seventeenth International Conference of the Red Cross in Stockholm in 1948 and confirmed by the Twenty-fifth Conference in Geneva in 1986, to the effect that the applicant Society, to be entitled to recognition, must "use the name and emblem of the Red Cross or Red Crescent in conformity with the Geneva Conventions". For the same reason, the League of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies could not admit the Israeli relief society.
Alvin Heims, 1 December 1999
Other "mixed" symbols suggested include a Red Palm for Syria and a Red
Rhinoceros for Sudan, along with a Red Archway for Afghanistan and a Red Lamb
for Congo. In Asia, there's a Red Wheel for India (along with a Red Swastika,
also for Sri Lanka), a Red Sun and Strip for Japan, and a Red Cross and Flame
for Thailand.
Nathan Lamm, 11 December 2005
Hosted by: Fanshop-Online.de und Handy-Shop.de
Tipp: Apple iPhone 15 im Shop